Dawkins, has spoken, and the world is shaken to its fiery bowels:
With respect to those meanings of "human" that are relevant to the morality of abortion, any fetus is less human than an adult pig.
The man is a not merely a scientist, but a biologist, too.
Hatred Explained
-
So, what is emerging one week after Charlie Kirk’s brutal assassination?
The assassin was the “boyfriend” of a male who fancies himself a woman.
That is, h...
5 hours ago
5 comments:
He's also a number of other things but it wouldn't be polite to include such descriptions on your blog.
If my information is correct , Dawkins's never been a hands on scientist.
Which wouldn't make him infallible, just more respectable.Ive a respect for , say, Fleming and Einstein, if not for every single point of view they had, which I havent for Dawkins.
Whereas we have now got - not that its a sine qua non, but we have - the first modern scientist Pope, a chemist.
For me its like politicians , only worse - Its not that that they're awful,they are, but that so many willingly vote for patent perverse evil.
Who forces people to listen to Dawkins? The BBC and the media give him a gigantic soapbox to stand on which they deny others - but people could use the off switch. The mesaage must be comforting for some, many it would seem, in some ways.
Which I have my ideas - eat and youll be like Gods might come into it somewhere.No responbility for your actions, hence no sin, might too.
Therefore an adult human must be like a baby pig and we can make sausages out of people!
As they say, when you don't believe in anything, you'll believe in anything.
Chris - thanks for your consideration! To hell with politeness. I fear litigation.
Mike - I guess most of the Great British Public swallow the idea that if you are a celebrity, you are not merely utterly fascinating, but always right.
Sam - thank you! Beautiful!
Ps The late Fred Hoyle - who apparently , both as an astrophysicist and as an atheist scientist coined the term "big bang" to pour scorn on the ideas on material creation put forward by a Catholic priest astrophysicist in the twenties- has just been posthumously proved right on some of the calculations on the fusion into higher elements -of which life is formed - in red giants,spread by supernovae, and so on , the Hoyle state of Carbon12, etc, (("Viability of Carbon-Based Life as a Function of the Light Quark Mass"Physical Review Letters)...
Ironically, his now-demonstrated work is one of these Goldilocks conditions for life that indicate , but do not prove, of course, intelligent design, with which he would not have been happy, which didn't stop him doing the work and publishing it.
For an outspoken disagreeable brilliant /blinkered quirky hardworking rude British friend of the truth and enemy of the truth atheist scientist, give me a hundred Fred Hoyles for every Dawkins.
Post a Comment